Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ultra 9 285H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
21.29
+93.2%
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking257709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency44.779.93
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HZen+ (2018−2019)
Release dateno data19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.35 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.29 11.02
Physical cores 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 105 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 93.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700X in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 285H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2962 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285H or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.