EPYC 9655P vs Ultra 7 265KF

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	89	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	97.72	2.62
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Power efficiency	28.07	23.66
Architecture codename	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Turin (2024)
Release date	24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)	10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$379	$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265KF has 3630% better value for money than EPYC 9655P.

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	20 (Icosa-Core)	96
Threads	20	192
Base clock speed	3.9 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	5.5 GHz	4.5 GHz
L1 cache	112 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	3 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	30 MB (shared)	384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	3 nm	4 nm
Die size	243 mm2	12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors	17,800 million	99,780 million
64 bit support	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	1851	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR5

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version	5.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	20	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	37.07	100.00
Physical cores	20	96
Threads	20	192
Chip lithography	3 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	400 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---