Pentium III 500E vs Ultra 7 265K
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 83 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 90.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 28.40 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
| Release date | 24 October 2024 (recently) | 25 October 1999 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $394 | $239 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 0.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | 106 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 28 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 1851 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 13 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 Depends on motherboard | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 October 2024 | 25 October 1999 |
| Physical cores | 20 | 1 |
| Threads | 20 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 13 Watt |
Ultra 7 265K has an age advantage of 24 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium III 500E, on the other hand, has 861.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265K and Pentium III 500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
