Ultra 7 266V vs Ultra 7 265K
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 85 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 94.56 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 28.16 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 24 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $394 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 8 | 4 |
| Efficient-cores | 12 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 20 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1851 | FCBGA2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 192 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics 140V |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4K @ 60Hz | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 8K @ 60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 4 |
| PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 20 | 8 |
| Threads | 20 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ultra 7 265K has 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.
Ultra 7 266V, on the other hand, has 635.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 266V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 7 266V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
