Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Ultra 7 164U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.51
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.99
+89.2%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Core Ultra 7 164U by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking797337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Uno data
Power efficiency100.0060.80
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-U (2023)Strix Point (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)July 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$448no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1420
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2551FP8
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsAMD Radeon 880M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.8 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes816
PCI support4.0 and 3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 164U 9.51
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.99
+89.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 164U 15106
Ryzen AI 9 365 28576
+89.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 164U 1304
Ryzen AI 9 365 2403
+84.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 164U 225
Ryzen AI 9 365 298
+32.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 164U 7503
Ryzen AI 9 365 11304
+50.7%

Blender(-)

Ultra 7 164U 395
+70.3%
Ryzen AI 9 365 232

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 7 164U 1522
Ryzen AI 9 365 2080
+36.7%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 164U 4619
Ryzen AI 9 365 5970
+29.2%

7-Zip

Ultra 7 164U 29361
Ryzen AI 9 365 56413
+92.1%

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 7 164U 236
Ryzen AI 9 365 322
+36.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.51 17.99
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 14 20
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 28 Watt

Ultra 7 164U has 20% more physical cores, and 211.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has a 89.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 42.9% more threads.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 164U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 37 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 164U or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.