Opteron 254 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.81
+5546%
Opteron 254
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 92 Watt
0.28

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Opteron 254 by a whopping 5546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4333130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.400.29
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Troy (2005)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads221
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 2049940
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt92 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.81
+5546%
Opteron 254 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25119
+5470%
Opteron 254 451

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 0.28
Physical cores 16 1
Threads 22 1
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 92 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 5546.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 254 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Opteron 254 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Opteron 254, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Opteron 254
Opteron 254

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Opteron 254, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.