Mobile Sempron 200U vs Ultra 7 155H
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 433 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 53.47 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Huron (2009) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 16 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $503 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2049 | ASB1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AMD64, SSE1-3, MMX |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 16 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 8 Watt |
Ultra 7 155H has an age advantage of 14 years, 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron 200U, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Mobile Sempron 200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
