Xeon w5-2565X vs Ultra 5 225F
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 103 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | no data | 11.68 |
Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | no data |
Release date | January 2025 | 1 July 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
Threads | 10 | 36 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 21 MB (shared) | 37.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 243 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 79 °C |
Number of transistors | 17,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 1851 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 288 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 10 | 18 |
Threads | 10 | 36 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 288 Watt |
Ultra 5 225F has 343.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon w5-2565X, on the other hand, has 80% more physical cores and 260% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-2565X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 225F and Xeon w5-2565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.