Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Ultra 5 125H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.02
+439%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.60

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1606G by a whopping 439% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5281732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency47.399.84
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)16 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads184
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache112 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache18 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.8 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2049FP5
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size96 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes288
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 125H 14.02
+439%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 2.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 125H 22266
+438%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 4135

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 5 125H 2054
+548%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 317

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 5 125H 247
+77.3%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 139

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 125H 10542
+454%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 1903

Blender(-)

Ultra 5 125H 267
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 1456
+446%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 5 125H 1676
+91.1%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 877

7-Zip Single

Ultra 5 125H 5043
+42.9%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 3528

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 5 125H 254
+71.6%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 148

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 5 125H 1548
+147%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 626

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.02 2.60
Recency 14 December 2023 16 April 2019
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 18 4
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Ultra 5 125H has a 439.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 600% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 125H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1606G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Embedded R1606G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 377 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1606G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or Ryzen Embedded R1606G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.