Celeron 725C vs Solo U1500

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3379	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Core Solo	no data
Power efficiency	1.89	no data
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	no data	1 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.33 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.33 GHz	1.3 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	no data	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB L2 KB	1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	504 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.85V - 1.1V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PBGA479	Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)	5.5 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C are enumerated here.

VT-x

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	65 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo U1500 and Celeron 725C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---