Athlon X2 4850e vs Solo U1300

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Core Solo	no data
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Brisbane (2007−2008)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	1.06 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.06 GHz	2.5 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	256 KB
L2 cache	no data	512 KB
L3 cache	2 MB L2 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	65 nm	65 nm
Die size	no data	126 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	154 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.85V - 1.1V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PBGA479	AM2
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e are enumerated here.

VT-x

+

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	45 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo U1300 and Athlon X2 4850e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---