Xeon W-3275M vs Solo T1350

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	195
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.96
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Core Solo	Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency	no data	11.58
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date	January 2006 (18 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads	1	56
Base clock speed	1.86 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.86 GHz	4.6 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI 3.0
Bus rate	533 MHz	4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	25
L1 cache	64 KB	1.75 MB
L2 cache	2 MB	28 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	38.5 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Die size	90 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	76 °C
Number of transistors	151 million	no data
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
VID voltage range	0.95V-1.262V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	PPGA478	FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
FSB parity	-	no data
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	-	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR1	DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size	no data	2 TB
Max memory channels	no data	6
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	28
Threads	1	56
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	205 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---