Mobile Sempron 3000+ vs Solo T1300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo T1300
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.13
Mobile Sempron 3000+
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.17
+30.8%

Mobile Sempron 3000+ outperforms Core Solo T1300 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33413279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloMobile Sempron
Power efficiency0.460.46
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Paris
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479no data
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Solo T1300 0.13
Mobile Sempron 3000+ 0.17
+30.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1300 210
Mobile Sempron 3000+ 269
+28.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 0.17
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 35 Watt

Solo T1300 has 29.6% lower power consumption.

Mobile Sempron 3000+, on the other hand, has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Mobile Sempron 3000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1300 and Mobile Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1300
Core Solo T1300
AMD Mobile Sempron 3000+
Mobile Sempron 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 30 votes

Rate Core Solo T1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1300 or Mobile Sempron 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.