Atom E680 vs Solo T1200
Aggregate performance score
Atom E680 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1200 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3306 | 3204 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.56 | 5.23 |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 479 | Intel BGA 676 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 4 Watt |
Atom E680 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 575% lower power consumption.
The Atom E680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
