Atom CE4100 vs Solo T1200
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Core Solo | no data |
Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Sodaville (2009) |
Release date | January 2006 (18 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 90 mm2 | 96 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 151 million | 47 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 479 | Intel BGA 951 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 7 Watt |
Atom CE4100 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Atom CE4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.