Celeron 1005M vs M-5Y10a

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10a
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.20
+71.4%
Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70

Core M-5Y10a outperforms Celeron 1005M by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23382704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MIntel Celeron
Power efficiency22.711.89
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed0.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size50 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency800 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10a 1.20
+71.4%
Celeron 1005M 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y10a 1905
+71.9%
Celeron 1005M 1108

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 0.70
Integrated graphics card 1.04 0.77
Recency 5 September 2014 1 July 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 35 Watt

M-5Y10a has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, 35.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

The Core M-5Y10a is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10a and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10a
Core M-5Y10a
Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core M-5Y10a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 251 vote

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10a or Celeron 1005M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.