i3-3229Y vs M-5Y10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.04
+62.5%
Core i3-3229Y
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.64

Core M-5Y10 outperforms Core i3-3229Y by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24352763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MIntel Core i3
Power efficiency19.604.64
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)8 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$250

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed0.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size50 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300Intel HD Graphics 4000
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency800 MHz850 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10 1.04
+62.5%
i3-3229Y 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y10 1644
+63.1%
i3-3229Y 1008

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

M-5Y10 462
+90.9%
i3-3229Y 242

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

M-5Y10 958
+75.5%
i3-3229Y 546

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

M-5Y10 3102
+65.9%
i3-3229Y 1870

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

M-5Y10 5217
+39.5%
i3-3229Y 3740

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

M-5Y10 1987
+27.7%
i3-3229Y 1556

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

M-5Y10 30.92
+33.2%
i3-3229Y 41.19

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

M-5Y10 2
+39%
i3-3229Y 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

M-5Y10 0.95
+90%
i3-3229Y 0.5

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

M-5Y10 1.2
+858%
i3-3229Y 0.1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

M-5Y10 10
+21.4%
i3-3229Y 8

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

M-5Y10 56
+29.3%
i3-3229Y 43

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

M-5Y10 1952
+55.4%
i3-3229Y 1256

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 0.64
Integrated graphics card 1.04 1.18
Recency 5 September 2014 8 January 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 13 Watt

M-5Y10 has a 62.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

i3-3229Y, on the other hand, has 13.5% faster integrated GPU.

The Core M-5Y10 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3229Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10 and Core i3-3229Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10
Core M-5Y10
Intel Core i3-3229Y
Core i3-3229Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Core i3-3229Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10 or Core i3-3229Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.