M-5Y10a vs M-5Y10

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.04
Core M-5Y10a
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.20
+15.4%

Core M-5Y10a outperforms Core M-5Y10 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24352336
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MIntel Core M
Power efficiency19.6022.62
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Broadwell-Y (2014)
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed0.8 GHz0.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size50 mm250 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCBGA1234
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response++
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 5300Intel HD Graphics 5300
Max video memory16 GB16 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency800 MHz800 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1211.2/12
OpenGL4.34.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10 1.04
M-5Y10a 1.20
+15.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y10 1644
M-5Y10a 1905
+15.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

M-5Y10 3102
M-5Y10a 3131
+0.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

M-5Y10 2
M-5Y10a 2
+17.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

M-5Y10 155
M-5Y10a 190
+22.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

M-5Y10 81
M-5Y10a 83
+2.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

M-5Y10 0.95
+1.1%
M-5Y10a 0.94

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 1.20

M-5Y10a has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core M-5Y10a is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y10 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10 and Core M-5Y10a, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10
Core M-5Y10
Intel Core M-5Y10a
Core M-5Y10a

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core M-5Y10a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10 or Core M-5Y10a, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.