Processor 300 vs Duo U2400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo U2400
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.16
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
+2719%

Processor 300 outperforms Core Duo U2400 by a whopping 2719% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32931319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore Duono data
Power efficiency1.689.27
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateno data8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.8-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA4791700
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Duo U2400 0.16
Processor 300 4.51
+2719%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo U2400 255
Processor 300 7160
+2708%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 4.51
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 46 Watt

Duo U2400 has 411.1% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 2718.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo U2400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Duo U2400 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo U2400 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo U2400
Core Duo U2400
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Core Duo U2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo U2400 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.