Celeron U3400 vs Duo T2600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date5 January 2006 (18 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$440no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate667 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size90 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors151 Million382 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3-800
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2600 460
Celeron U3400 516
+12.2%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2006 24 May 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron U3400 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 72.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2600 and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2600
Core Duo T2600
Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Core Duo T2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2600 or Celeron U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.