EPYC 7302P vs Duo T2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2500
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.25
EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
19.65
+7760%

EPYC 7302P outperforms Core Duo T2500 by a whopping 7760% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3350336
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0112.15
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore DuoAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.325.07
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (19 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120$825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7302P has 121400% better value for money than Duo T2500.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache0 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size90 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Duo T2500 0.25
EPYC 7302P 19.65
+7760%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Duo T2500 408
EPYC 7302P 32690
+7912%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 19.65
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 155 Watt

Duo T2500 has 400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7302P, on the other hand, has a 7760% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7302P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Duo T2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Duo T2500 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2500
Core Duo T2500
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Core Duo T2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 29 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Duo T2500 and EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.