Duron 1300 vs Duo T2450

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore DuoAMD Duron
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)30 January 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate533 MHz200 MT/s
Multiplierno data13
L2 cacheno data64 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data105.68 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.262Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 60 Watt

Duo T2450 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 93.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Duo T2450 is a notebook processor while Duron 1300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2450 and Duron 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2450
Core Duo T2450
AMD Duron 1300
Duron 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 10 votes

Rate Core Duo T2450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Duron 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2450 or Duron 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.