Celeron M 440 vs Duo T2400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2400
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.23
+109%
Celeron M 440
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.11

Core Duo T2400 outperforms Celeron M 440 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31903377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore DuoCeleron M
Power efficiency0.700.39
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$16no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.83 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache0 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3V1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Duo T2400 0.23
+109%
Celeron M 440 0.11

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark06 CPU

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2400 362
+114%
Celeron M 440 169

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Duo T2400 1488
+51.8%
Celeron M 440 980

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.11
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 27 Watt

Duo T2400 has a 109.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 440, on the other hand, has 14.8% lower power consumption.

The Core Duo T2400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 440 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2400 and Celeron M 440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2400
Core Duo T2400
Intel Celeron M 440
Celeron M 440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4
25 votes

Rate Core Duo T2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4
12 votes

Rate Celeron M 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2400 or Celeron M 440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.