Turion 64 MT-30 vs Duo T2300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore DuoTurion 64
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size90 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 million114 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479754
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 25 Watt

Duo T2300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 MT-30, on the other hand, has 24% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2300 and Turion 64 MT-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2300
Core Duo T2300
AMD Turion 64 MT-30
Turion 64 MT-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 vote

Rate Core Duo T2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2300 or Turion 64 MT-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.