Athlon II Neo K125 vs Duo T2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2300
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.20
Athlon II Neo K125
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 12 Watt
0.20

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32173221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore DuoAMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency0.611.58
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Geneva (2010)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz2000 MHz
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479S1
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Duo T2300 0.20
Athlon II Neo K125 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2300 325
+3.2%
Athlon II Neo K125 315

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Duo T2300 1380
+87.7%
Athlon II Neo K125 735

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 12 Watt

Duo T2300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon II Neo K125, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 158.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2300 and Athlon II Neo K125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2300
Core Duo T2300
AMD Athlon II Neo K125
Athlon II Neo K125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 vote

Rate Core Duo T2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 20 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2300 or Athlon II Neo K125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.