i5-11400F vs Duo T2250

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated720
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.97
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore Duono data
Power efficiencyno data15.61
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$157

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.7625-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2250 350
i5-11400F 17027
+4765%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Duo T2250 1537
i5-11400F 6210
+304%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Duo T2250 2884
i5-11400F 44220
+1433%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Duo T2250 1405
i5-11400F 13359
+851%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

Duo T2250 has 109.7% lower power consumption.

i5-11400F, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Duo T2250 is a notebook processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2250 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2250
Core Duo T2250
Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Core Duo T2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8668 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2250 or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.