Celeron M 630 MHz vs Duo L2400

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3186not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore DuoCeleron M
Power efficiency2.31no data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)no data
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz0.63 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V - 1.212Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPBGA479no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 5 Watt

Duo L2400 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 630 MHz, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo L2400 and Celeron M 630 MHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo L2400
Core Duo L2400
Intel Celeron M 630 MHz
Celeron M 630 MHz

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Core Duo L2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 630 MHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo L2400 or Celeron M 630 MHz, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.