Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core 2 Solo U2200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo U2200
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.20
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.88
+4840%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core 2 Solo U2200 by a whopping 4840% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3241784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 SoloAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency3.4414.38
Architecture codenameMerom-L (2007)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release dateno data19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.8V-1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Solo U2200 0.20
Ryzen 7 2700 9.88
+4840%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Solo U2200 311
Ryzen 7 2700 15696
+4947%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 9.88
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Solo U2200 has 1200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700, on the other hand, has a 4840% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo U2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Solo U2200 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo U2200 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo U2200
Core 2 Solo U2200
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo U2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3149 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo U2200 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.