Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Core 2 Duo P8400 Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T9300 Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9900 Pentium Dual Core T4200 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500
VS
Celeron N2840 Celeron N3000 Celeron N3010 Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Celeron N3150 Celeron N3160 Celeron N3350 Celeron N3450 Celeron N4000 Celeron N4020 Celeron N4500

Contents

Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data11.04
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262$24

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FSB parity-no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 1468
Celeron N3350 1490
+1.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 654
Celeron N3350 1655
+153%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 112.25
Celeron N3350 45.5
+147%

Pros & cons summary

Recency 1 April 2009 30 August 2016
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 20% lower power consumption.

Celeron N3350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron N3350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
vs
Ryzen 3 5425C Ryzen 3 5425C
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
vs
A9-9420e A9 9420e
Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
vs
Core 2 Duo T6770 Core 2 Duo T6770
i3-330UM Core i3 330UM
vs
Ryzen 7 6800HS Ryzen 7 6800HS
Celeron M 585 Celeron M 585
vs
Celeron N4020 Celeron N4020
Mobile Sempron M100 Mobile Sempron M100
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 Iris Pro Graphics P580
Pentium 4 630 Pentium 4 630
vs
Sempron LE-1100 Sempron LE 1100
Atom N570 Atom N570
vs
i5-13400F Core i5 13400F
Solo T1200 Core Solo T1200
vs
i5-2497M Core i5 2497M
Pentium M 705 Pentium M 705
vs
Ryzen 5 7545U Ryzen 5 7545U
Celeron M 310 Celeron M 310
vs
Ryzen 5 7545U Ryzen 5 7545U
Solo U1300 Core Solo U1300
vs
i3-7310T Core i3 7310T
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 Crusoe TM 5800
vs
m3-8114Y Core m3 8114Y

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 956 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Celeron N3350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.