Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Solono data
Power efficiencyno data0.61
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache3 MB512K
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956AM2
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 89 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1680% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.