EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Core 2 Quad Q9650

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2108not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency1.55no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (per die)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data512 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC Embedded 3101 has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9650 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3101 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9650 and EPYC Embedded 3101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
EPYC Embedded 3101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1610 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9650 or EPYC Embedded 3101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.