Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition vs Core 2 Quad Q9550
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2158 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | Intel Core i7EE |
| Power efficiency | 1.46 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Nehalem (2008−2010) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,054 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 2.5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 12288 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 296 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 774 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1,DDR2,DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
i7-920XM Extreme Edition has 100% more threads, and 72.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9550 is a desktop processor while Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Core i7-920XM Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
