Pentium Gold G7400TE vs Core 2 Quad Q9505S
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2009 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9505S has 100% more physical cores.
Pentium Gold G7400TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505S and Pentium Gold G7400TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
