Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Core 2 Quad Q9505
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2233 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 1.35 | no data |
Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 2009 (15 years ago) | 11 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.83 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
Die size | 164 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 456 million | 4,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA775,LGA775 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600AF has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.