PRO A6-8570 vs Core 2 Quad Q9500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9500
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.40
+16.7%
PRO A6-8570
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.20

Core 2 Quad Q9500 outperforms PRO A6-8570 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22122337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.391.75
Architecture codenameno dataCarrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.83 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Switchable graphics-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 1.40
+16.7%
PRO A6-8570 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 2224
+16.7%
PRO A6-8570 1906

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 1.20
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9500 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

PRO A6-8570, on the other hand, has a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-8570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and PRO A6-8570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
Core 2 Quad Q9500
AMD PRO A6-8570
PRO A6-8570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1209 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 32 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9500 or PRO A6-8570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.