GX-215JJ vs Core 2 Quad Q9500
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2207 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 1.39 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Prairie Falcon (2016−2018) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 23 February 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | LGA775 | FP4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R2E 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
GX-215JJ, on the other hand, has a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop processor while GX-215JJ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and GX-215JJ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.