Phenom X4 9600B vs Core 2 Quad Q9450

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.38
+20%
Phenom X4 9600B
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.15

Core 2 Quad Q9450 outperforms Phenom X4 9600B by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22252374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.371.15
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2285 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 1.38
+20%
Phenom X4 9600B 1.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 2186
+20%
Phenom X4 9600B 1822

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 344
+23.7%
Phenom X4 9600B 278

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9450 952
Phenom X4 9600B 993
+4.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 1.15
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Core 2 Quad Q9450 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom X4 9600B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Phenom X4 9600B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Core 2 Quad Q9450
AMD Phenom X4 9600B
Phenom X4 9600B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9450 or Phenom X4 9600B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.