Xeon 5140 vs Core 2 Quad Q9400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9400
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.35
+150%
Xeon 5140
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54

Core 2 Quad Q9400 outperforms Xeon 5140 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22412835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.27
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.340.78
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Woodcrest (2006)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$15

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2.33 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)0 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data65 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625VB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 1.35
+150%
Xeon 5140 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 2133
+149%
Xeon 5140 857

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 0.54
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9400 has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 5140, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5140 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9400 is a desktop processor while Xeon 5140 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Xeon 5140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Xeon 5140
Xeon 5140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1551 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9400 or Xeon 5140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.