Atom N2850 vs Core 2 Quad Q9400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2241not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.34no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9400 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom N2850, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9400 is a desktop processor while Atom N2850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1551 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9400 or Atom N2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.