Pentium E6700 vs Core 2 Quad Q9300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.30
+68.8%

Core 2 Quad Q9300 outperforms Pentium E6700 by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22922651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.16
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.251.08
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)30 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 81 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 1.30
+68.8%
Pentium E6700 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 1984
+67.9%
Pentium E6700 1182

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 318
Pentium E6700 353
+11%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9300 888
+54.2%
Pentium E6700 576

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 0.77
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9300 has a 68.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium E6700, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Pentium E6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Pentium E6700
Pentium E6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 760 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 130 votes

Rate Pentium E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9300 or Pentium E6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.