Ryzen Threadripper 1930X vs Core 2 Quad Q9000
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2456 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core 2 Quad | no data |
Power efficiency | 2.09 | no data |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $348 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 32768 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.175V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | PGA478 | SP3r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 177.8% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1930X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.