Iris Graphics 48 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2462not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Iris Graphics
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Gen9
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

Iris Graphics 48 has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.