Core Ultra 9 285 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2456not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Quadno data
Power efficiency2.09no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size107 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA4781851
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core Ultra 9 285, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 67 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Core Ultra 9 285, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.