Xeon w7-3455 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8200
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.17
Xeon w7-3455
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 270 Watt
38.16
+3162%

Xeon w7-3455 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a whopping 3162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking238491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.22
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.1212.89
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,489

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB67.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 81 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C72 °C
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1.17
Xeon w7-3455 38.16
+3162%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1783
Xeon w7-3455 58393
+3175%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 293
Xeon w7-3455 1848
+531%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 824
Xeon w7-3455 13513
+1540%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 38.16
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 270 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 184.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3455, on the other hand, has a 3161.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon w7-3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Xeon w7-3455
Xeon w7-3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 539 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200 or Xeon w7-3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.