Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs Core 2 Quad Q6700

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q6700
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.32
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.60
+21.2%

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6700 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22662105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.311.21
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)7 November 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2258 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)62 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 1.32
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 1.60
+21.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 2097
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 2544
+21.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 1.60
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6700 has 19% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), on the other hand, has a 21.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 144 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 655 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6700 or Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.