Xeon 5030 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2369not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.03no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Dempsey (2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data0 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon 5030. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 100% more physical cores.

Xeon 5030, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Xeon 5030. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Xeon 5030 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Xeon 5030, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Xeon 5030
Xeon 5030

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1743 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Xeon 5030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Xeon 5030, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.