Celeron M 333 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2375 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 5 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 333, on the other hand, has 2000% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 333 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Celeron M 333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
