V-Series V105 vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Core 2 Duo P8400 Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T9300 Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9900 Pentium Dual Core T4200 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500
VS
V-Series V105 V-Series V120 V-Series V140 V-Series V160

Contents

Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
V-Series V105 V-Series V105

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2709not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD V-Series
Power efficiency1.50no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz2000 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 3072
+199%
V-Series V105 1028

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 29
+341%
V-Series V105 128

Pros & cons summary

Recency 10 January 2008 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 9 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9000 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

V-Series V105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 388.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and V-Series V105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD V-Series V105
V-Series V105
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
vs
Celeron 1005M Celeron 1005M
V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88
Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
vs
A9-9420e A9 9420e
Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
vs
Phenom II X3 N830 Phenom II X3 N830
Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
vs
C-70 C 70
Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9600
vs
A6-1450 A6 1450
Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9600
vs
A4-3300M A4 3300M
Core 2 Duo P9700 Core 2 Duo P9700
vs
A9-9420e A9 9420e
Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
vs
A6-9220 A6 9220
Core 2 Extreme X9000 Core 2 Extreme X9000
vs
A4-9120 A4 9120
Core 2 Duo E6850 Core 2 Duo E6850
vs
Athlon II X2 250e Athlon II X2 250e
Core 2 Duo E6850 Core 2 Duo E6850
vs
Phenom II X2 545 Phenom II X2 545

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 11 votes

Rate V-Series V105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or V-Series V105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.