Celeron G440 vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2707not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Extremeno data
Power efficiency1.49no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851$45

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache6 MB256 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C66 °C
Number of transistors410 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
+162%
Celeron G440 420

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2008 4 September 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9000 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G440, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 25.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while Celeron G440 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
Intel Celeron G440
Celeron G440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 52 votes

Rate Celeron G440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or Celeron G440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.