Athlon 800 vs Core 2 Extreme X9000
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2726 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.48 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 20 December 1999 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | $799 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.275V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 43 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2008 | 20 December 1999 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 43 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme X9000 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 800, on the other hand, has 2.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while Athlon 800 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Athlon 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
